match point news
Tennis Cricket Football Wimbledon ICC Tournaments FIFA Basketball Olympic Games
AboutContactPrivacy Policy

Nobody has ever felt a racket cut through the air

Aerodynamic frame marketing describes a real physical effect that is far too small for a human hand to detect.

Nobody has ever felt a racket cut through the air

The claim is that a shaped beam moves faster through the air and therefore gives you more racket head speed. The physics is not fake. A frame does experience drag, the profile does change it, and if you put two rackets on a machine and swing them at identical torque you will measure a difference. The question nobody in the marketing department wants asked is whether the difference survives contact with an actual arm.

Think about the numbers involved. A racket head travels somewhere in the region of a hundred kilometres per hour at contact on a hard forehand, and the frame presents a cross section of a few square centimetres to the air. The energy lost to drag over the arc of a swing is real but tiny compared with what the shoulder and trunk are putting in, and it is dwarfed by variation in the swing itself. Your own second forehand of a rally differs from your first by more than any two frames differ from each other.

What people are actually feeling when they say a frame cuts through the air is swingweight. Where the mass sits relative to the hand. That is a much larger effect, it is measurable in a way any club player can perceive within three balls, and it has nothing to do with the shape of the beam. A slippery looking frame that is head heavy will feel slow. A blocky one balanced towards the handle will feel fast. The eye and the marketing then supply the wrong explanation.

I am not saying manufacturers are lying. I am saying the honest version of the claim would be so hedged that nobody could put it on a box.

There is one place the aerodynamic story earns its keep, and it is the serve, where the racket travels further and faster than anywhere else and where the arm is closest to its limit. Even there I would want blind testing before I believed a player could name which frame was which.

The trouble with equipment claims in tennis is that belief is itself performance enhancing. A player who thinks the racket is faster swings faster.

That is a real effect. It is just not the one being sold.

How did you feel about this article?