match point news
Tennis Cricket Football Wimbledon ICC Tournaments FIFA Basketball Olympic Games
AboutContactPrivacy Policy

Every recovery run is a rest you already spent

Recovery sprints get praised as effort, but each one is evidence that the shape broke somewhere higher up the pitch.

Every recovery run is a rest you already spent

There is a particular cheer that goes up when a winger chases sixty yards back to make a sliding tackle near his own corner flag. It is a good noise. I enjoy it as much as anyone. But I have started counting those runs rather than applauding them, because every single one is a bill arriving for something that went wrong earlier.

A recovery run happens because a player was on the wrong side of an opponent when the ball turned over. That is the definition. Not because he is lazy, necessarily; more often because the team pressed with four and the other six did not shift, or because a full back went to join an attack that had already stalled. The run is the correction. The error was upstream, twenty seconds before, and it usually belonged to somebody else.

Now think about the physiology of it. A recovery run is close to maximal, it happens without warning, and it ends in a deceleration or a duel. That is the most expensive thing a footballer can do. Ten of them in a half will cost a player more than an hour of ordinary possession work. And the cost is not paid on the day. It is paid on Wednesday, when he is a fraction slow off the mark, and again the following Sunday.

So a team that generates a lot of recovery running is not a team of fighters. It is a team burning next week's legs to fix this week's structure. I would rather have a side that looks slightly less committed and arrives in April with its wingers intact.

The counter argument is fair enough. Some recovery running is designed in. If you defend with a high line and invert a full back, you have accepted that certain balls in behind will be chased down rather than prevented, and you build the squad accordingly with quick, young, replaceable legs in those roles. That is a choice. It is coherent.

What is not coherent is praising the run and never asking who created it. The camera loves the chase because the chase is visible and the structural error is not. Twenty seconds earlier, off screen, somebody stepped up alone. Nobody cheers for the player who did not have to run.

How did you feel about this article?