match point news
Tennis Cricket Football Wimbledon ICC Tournaments FIFA Basketball Olympic Games
AboutContactPrivacy Policy

Counterpressing starts before you lose the ball

Reaction time after a turnover is the wrong measure, because the teams who win it back fastest were already positioned to do so.

Counterpressing starts before you lose the ball

The five second rule made counterpressing legible to everyone. Lose the ball, swarm it, win it back within five seconds or drop into shape. Simple, quotable, and it hides the part that actually determines whether it works, which is where the players were standing when possession was lost.

You cannot counterpress from a bad shape at any speed. If your attack has finished with two players in the box, one on each touchline and a midfielder thirty yards behind the ball, the geometry is already lost, and it does not matter how quickly anybody reacts. The nearest presser is fifteen metres away, the second is twenty five, the opponent plays one pass and you are chasing shadows. Teams in that situation react fast and get punished anyway, and the video session afterwards talks about intensity when it should be talking about spacing.

So the honest metric is not the speed of the reaction. It is the number of players within roughly ten metres of the ball at the moment of the turnover. Get that number to three and the press is nearly automatic. Two and it is a gamble. One and you should be dropping off, and the discipline to drop off rather than dive in is the part that separates a serious side from an enthusiastic one.

Which means counterpressing is designed during the attacking phase, not after it. Every decision about how many bodies to commit forward, how compact to keep the second line, whether to overload one side of the pitch, is really a decision about what your press will look like in six seconds time. Overloading a flank is popular partly for this reason. It concentrates bodies. Lose the ball there and you already have your three.

The trade off is that concentration on one side leaves the far side open, so if the opponent survives the first two seconds and switches, you are exposed badly and quickly.

I would rather a team pressed less often and better than pressed everything. The half committed counterpress is the worst of all worlds. It gives away the space of a high press and wins none of the balls, and it exhausts a squad by March for the pleasure of looking busy in September.

How did you feel about this article?